Ryzen 5 2600 vs i7-740QM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-740QM
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
1.15
Ryzen 5 2600
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.30
+622%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-740QM by a whopping 622% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-740QM and Ryzen 5 2600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2370905
Place by popularitynot in top-10022
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.78
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency2.4212.08
Architecture codenameClarksfield (2009−2010)Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)
Release date20 June 2010 (14 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$546$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-740QM and Ryzen 5 2600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed1.73 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate2.5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier1334
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)3 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm12 nm
Die size296 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Number of transistors774 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-740QM and Ryzen 5 2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988AM4
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-740QM and Ryzen 5 2600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAE36 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-740QM and Ryzen 5 2600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-740QM and Ryzen 5 2600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-740QM and Ryzen 5 2600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardNone-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-740QM and Ryzen 5 2600.

PCIe version23.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-740QM 1.15
Ryzen 5 2600 8.30
+622%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-740QM 1833
Ryzen 5 2600 13189
+620%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-740QM 347
Ryzen 5 2600 1163
+235%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-740QM 967
Ryzen 5 2600 4895
+406%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-740QM 3082
Ryzen 5 2600 4726
+53.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-740QM 8930
Ryzen 5 2600 28173
+215%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-740QM 3318
Ryzen 5 2600 9290
+180%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-740QM 15.8
Ryzen 5 2600 5.5
+187%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-740QM 3
Ryzen 5 2600 14
+335%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.15 8.30
Recency 20 June 2010 19 April 2018
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 45 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

i7-740QM has 44.4% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 2600, on the other hand, has a 621.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 2600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-740QM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-740QM is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-740QM and Ryzen 5 2600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-740QM
Core i7-740QM
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 157 votes

Rate Core i7-740QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 14980 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-740QM or Ryzen 5 2600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.