Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Atom N280

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N280 and Ryzen 5 7535HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated668
Place by popularitynot in top-10024
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data31.31
Architecture codenameDiamondVille (2008−2009)Rembrandt-R (2023)
Release date1 February 2009 (15 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom N280 and Ryzen 5 7535HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.66 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz4.55 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate666.66 MT/sno data
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache56 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm6 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C95 °C
Number of transistors47 Millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom N280 and Ryzen 5 7535HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437FP7
Power consumption (TDP)2.5 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N280 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom N280 and Ryzen 5 7535HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N280 and Ryzen 5 7535HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N280 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon 660M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N280 and Ryzen 5 7535HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N280 157
Ryzen 5 7535HS 18398
+11618%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom N280 567
Ryzen 5 7535HS 6257
+1004%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom N280 877
Ryzen 5 7535HS 37321
+4156%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Atom N280 507
Ryzen 5 7535HS 12242
+2315%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom N280 115
Ryzen 5 7535HS 8.4
+1269%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2009 4 January 2023
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 45 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 35 Watt

Atom N280 has 1650% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 7535HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N280 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N280 and Ryzen 5 7535HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N280
Atom N280
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
Ryzen 5 7535HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 30 votes

Rate Atom N280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1405 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7535HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N280 or Ryzen 5 7535HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.