A9-9410 vs i7-4860EQ
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-4860EQ outperforms A9-9410 by a whopping 260% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1537 | 2493 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | AMD Bristol Ridge |
| Power efficiency | 6.97 | 6.06 |
| Architecture codename | Crystalwell (2013−2014) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 29 August 2013 (11 years ago) | 31 May 2016 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 32 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 2048 KB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 264 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1364 | FP4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 47 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Virtualization, |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| FRTC | - | + |
| FreeSync | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2133 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 5200 | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics |
| iGPU core count | no data | 3 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.46 | 0.96 |
| Recency | 29 August 2013 | 31 May 2016 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 47 Watt | 15 Watt |
i7-4860EQ has a 260.4% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.
A9-9410, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 213.3% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-4860EQ is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9410 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
