A9-9410 vs i7-4860EQ

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-4860EQ
2014
4 cores / 8 threads, 47 Watt
3.60
+260%

Core i7-4860EQ outperforms A9-9410 by a whopping 260% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15162463
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameCrystalwell (2013−2014)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date20 February 2014 (10 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB2048 KB
L3 cache6 MBno data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size264 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °C74 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA1364FP4
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD 5200AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data3
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-4860EQ 3.60
+260%
A9-9410 1.00

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-4860EQ 5500
+261%
A9-9410 1523

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.60 1.00
Recency 20 February 2014 31 May 2016
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 15 Watt

i7-4860EQ has a 260% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

A9-9410, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 213.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-4860EQ is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9410 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4860EQ and A9-9410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-4860EQ
Core i7-4860EQ
AMD A9-9410
A9-9410

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-4860EQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 113 votes

Rate A9-9410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-4860EQ or A9-9410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.