Xeon 7140N vs i7-3525M
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-3525M and Xeon 7140N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Tulsa (2006) |
| Release date | 1 November 2012 (12 years ago) | August 2006 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-3525M and Xeon 7140N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.33 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.33 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 0 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 160 mm2 | 435 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 69 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,480 million | 1328 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.1V-1.35V |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-3525M and Xeon 7140N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1023 | PPGA604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3525M and Xeon 7140N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i7-3525M and Xeon 7140N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3525M and Xeon 7140N are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3525M and Xeon 7140N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | unknown Dual-channel | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 4000 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 150 Watt |
i7-3525M has a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 328.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-3525M and Xeon 7140N. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i7-3525M is a notebook processor while Xeon 7140N is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3525M and Xeon 7140N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
