Athlon 3000G vs Core i7-2840QM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2840QM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.48
Athlon 3000G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.90
+16.9%

Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i7-2840QM by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2840QM and Athlon 3000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16741584
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.86
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Athlon
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Zen+ (2018−2020)
Release date4 September 2011 (12 years ago)21 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$49
Current priceno data$110 (2.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2840QM and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus support4 × 5 GT/sno data
L1 cache256 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size216 mm2209.78 mm2?
Number of transistors1160 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2840QM and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSocket G2AM4
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2840QM and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
PowerNowno data+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2840QM and Athlon 3000G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2840QM and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2840QM and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB?
Maximum memory bandwidth25.598 GB/s42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2840QM and Athlon 3000G.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2840QM 2.48
Athlon 3000G 2.90
+16.9%

Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i7-2840QM by 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-2840QM 3842
Athlon 3000G 4489
+16.8%

Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i7-2840QM by 17% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.48 2.90
Integrated graphics card 0.66 2.97
Recency 4 September 2011 21 November 2019
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

The Athlon 3000G is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2840QM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2840QM is a notebook processor while Athlon 3000G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2840QM and Athlon 3000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2840QM
Core i7-2840QM
AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2840QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2001 vote

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2840QM or Athlon 3000G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.