Celeron G3900 vs i7-2640M

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2640M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.55
+14.8%
Celeron G3900
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.35

Core i7-2640M outperforms Celeron G3900 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2640M and Celeron G3900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21132241
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.18
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Celeron
Power efficiency4.192.51
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date4 September 2011 (13 years ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$346$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2640M and Celeron G3900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2828
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size149 mm2150 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors624 Million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2640M and Celeron G3900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1023,PPGA988FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2640M and Celeron G3900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2640M and Celeron G3900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2640M and Celeron G3900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2640M and Celeron G3900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth228.707 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000Intel HD Graphics 510
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHz950 MHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2640M and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-2640M and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-2640M and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2640M and Celeron G3900.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2640M 1.55
+14.8%
Celeron G3900 1.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2640M 2467
+15.1%
Celeron G3900 2144

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-2640M 515
Celeron G3900 586
+13.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-2640M 1019
+1.7%
Celeron G3900 1002

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 1.35
Integrated graphics card 0.66 1.61
Recency 4 September 2011 1 September 2015
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 51 Watt

i7-2640M has a 14.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and 45.7% lower power consumption.

Celeron G3900, on the other hand, has 143.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-2640M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2640M is a notebook processor while Celeron G3900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2640M and Celeron G3900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2640M
Core i7-2640M
Intel Celeron G3900
Celeron G3900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 344 votes

Rate Core i7-2640M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 223 votes

Rate Celeron G3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2640M or Celeron G3900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.