A6-8500P vs Core i7-2610UE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2610UE
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.91

A6-8500P outperforms Core i7-2610UE by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2610UE and A6-8500P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24252410
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Carrizo
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release dateno data3 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$317no data
Current price$4700 (14.8x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2610UE and A6-8500P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3 GHz
Bus support4 × 5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1024 KB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors624 Million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2610UE and A6-8500P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Socketno dataFP4
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2610UE and A6-8500P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHSA 1.0
AES-NI+1
FMA+FMA4
AVX+AVX
FRTCno data1
FreeSyncno data1
PowerTuneno data-
TrueAudiono data+
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
Out-of-band client managementno data+
VirusProtectno data+
HSAno data+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2610UE and A6-8500P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2610UE and A6-8500P are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data1
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2610UE and A6-8500P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333Not Listed
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Endurono data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
UVDno data+
VCEno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2610UE and A6-8500P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-2610UE and A6-8500P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2610UE and A6-8500P.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2610UE 0.91
A6-8500P 0.93
+2.2%

A6-8500P outperforms Core i7-2610UE by 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-2610UE 1409
A6-8500P 1445
+2.6%

A6-8500P outperforms Core i7-2610UE by 3% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.91 0.93
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 15 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-2610UE and A6-8500P.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2610UE and A6-8500P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2610UE
Core i7-2610UE
AMD A6-8500P
A6-8500P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2610UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate A6-8500P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2610UE or A6-8500P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.