A6-9225 vs Core i7-2610UE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2610UE
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.91
+5.8%

i7-2610UE outperforms A6-9225 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2610UE and A6-9225 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24362462
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release dateno data1 June 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$317no data
Current price$4700 (14.8x MSRP)$451

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2610UE and A6-9225 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus support4 × 5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB160 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors624 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2610UE and A6-9225 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Socketno dataBGA
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2610UE and A6-9225. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR4-2133 RAM (1 channel), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2610UE and A6-9225 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2610UE and A6-9225 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2610UE and A6-9225. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2610UE 0.91
+5.8%
A6-9225 0.86

Core i7-2610UE outperforms A6-9225 by 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-2610UE 1409
+5.5%
A6-9225 1335

Core i7-2610UE outperforms A6-9225 by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.91 0.86
Integrated graphics card 0.66 1.17
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 15 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-2610UE and A6-9225.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2610UE and A6-9225, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2610UE
Core i7-2610UE
AMD A6-9225
A6-9225

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2610UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2224 votes

Rate A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2610UE or A6-9225, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.