Celeron 667 vs i5-9400F

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-9400F and Celeron 667 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1091not rated
Place by popularity25not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.23no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Power efficiency8.68no data
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Timna
Release date7 January 2019 (5 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$182no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-9400F and Celeron 667 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads61
Base clock speed2.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz0.67 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache385 KB32 KB
L2 cache1.5 MB128 KB
L3 cache9 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm180 nm
Die size149 mm2129 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-9400F and Celeron 667 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151370S
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-9400F and Celeron 667. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Core i5-9400F and Celeron 667 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-9400F and Celeron 667 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-9400F and Celeron 667. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel i752

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-9400F and Celeron 667.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 1
Threads 6 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 30 Watt

i5-9400F has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 667, on the other hand, has 116.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i5-9400F and Celeron 667. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-9400F and Celeron 667, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-9400F
Core i5-9400F
Intel Celeron 667
Celeron 667

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 56572 votes

Rate Core i5-9400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 667 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-9400F or Celeron 667, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.