Apple M1 Pro vs i9-9900KF

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9900KF
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
11.47
+5.9%
Apple M1 Pro
2021
10 cores / 10 threads
10.83

Core i9-9900KF outperforms Apple M1 Pro by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9900KF and Apple M1 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking688721
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.45no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i9Apple M-Series
Power efficiency11.43no data
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)no data
Release date8 January 2019 (5 years ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$488no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900KF and Apple M1 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1610
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.22 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)2.9 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)28 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900KF and Apple M1 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA1151no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900KF and Apple M1 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Core i9-9900KF and Apple M1 Pro technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900KF and Apple M1 Pro are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900KF and Apple M1 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900KF and Apple M1 Pro.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9900KF 11.47
+5.9%
Apple M1 Pro 10.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9900KF 18220
+5.9%
Apple M1 Pro 17200

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.47 10.83
Recency 8 January 2019 18 October 2021
Physical cores 8 10
Threads 16 10
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

i9-9900KF has a 5.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 60% more threads.

Apple M1 Pro, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 25% more physical cores, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i9-9900KF and Apple M1 Pro.

Note that Core i9-9900KF is a desktop processor while Apple M1 Pro is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9900KF and Apple M1 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9900KF
Core i9-9900KF
Apple M1 Pro
M1 Pro

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 512 votes

Rate Core i9-9900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 410 votes

Rate Apple M1 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9900KF or Apple M1 Pro, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.