Atom 330 vs i5-750

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-750 and Atom 330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2093not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.15no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore i5 (Desktop)Intel Atom
Power efficiency1.59no data
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Diamondville (2008−2009)
Release date8 September 2009 (15 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$150$43

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-750 and Atom 330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.66 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate2500 MHz533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size296 mm251.9276 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C85 °C
Number of transistors774 million94 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-750 and Atom 330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-750 and Atom 330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching--
PAE36 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i5-750 and Atom 330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-750 and Atom 330 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-750 and Atom 330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GB8 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/A-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-750 and Atom 330.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-750 2532
+598%
Atom 330 363

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-750 3458
+538%
Atom 330 542

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-750 11048
+622%
Atom 330 1530

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i5-750 4320
+424%
Atom 330 825

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-750 12.06
+866%
Atom 330 116.45

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 September 2009 2 April 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 8 Watt

i5-750 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores.

Atom 330, on the other hand, has 1087.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i5-750 and Atom 330. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i5-750 is a desktop processor while Atom 330 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-750 and Atom 330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-750
Core i5-750
Intel Atom 330
Atom 330

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 984 votes

Rate Core i5-750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 64 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-750 or Atom 330, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.