EPYC 7343 vs Core i7-920

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-920
2008
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.83
EPYC 7343
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 190 Watt
28.57
+1461%

EPYC 7343 outperforms Core i7-920 by a whopping 1461% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-920 and EPYC 7343 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1915150
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.229.87
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore i7 (Desktop)AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Milan (2021)
Release dateNovember 2008 (15 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$340$1,565
Current price$65 (0.2x MSRP)$2790 (1.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7343 has 709% better value for money than i7-920.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-920 and EPYC 7343 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed2.66 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus support1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm+
Die size263 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors731 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-920 and EPYC 7343 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1366,PLGA1366SP3
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt190 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-920 and EPYC 7343. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-920 and EPYC 7343 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-920 and EPYC 7343 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-920 and EPYC 7343. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size24 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-920 and EPYC 7343.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-920 1.83
EPYC 7343 28.57
+1461%

EPYC 7343 outperforms Core i7-920 by 1461% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-920 2835
EPYC 7343 44189
+1459%

EPYC 7343 outperforms Core i7-920 by 1459% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-920 415
EPYC 7343 1533
+269%

EPYC 7343 outperforms Core i7-920 by 269% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-920 1428
EPYC 7343 11934
+736%

EPYC 7343 outperforms Core i7-920 by 736% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.83 28.57
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 32
Cost $340 $1565
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 190 Watt

The EPYC 7343 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-920 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-920 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7343 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-920 and EPYC 7343, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-920
Core i7-920
AMD EPYC 7343
EPYC 7343

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 388 votes

Rate Core i7-920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7343 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-920 or EPYC 7343, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.