Xeon Gold 6212U vs Core i5-6500TE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-6500TE
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
3.05
Xeon Gold 6212U
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
17.76
+482%

Xeon Gold 6212U outperforms i5-6500TE by a whopping 482% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-6500TE and Xeon Gold 6212U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1553320
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2315.12
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Xeon Gold
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date19 October 2015 (8 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$192$2,000
Current price$490 (2.6x MSRP)$1312 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6212U has 6474% better value for money than i5-6500TE.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-6500TE and Xeon Gold 6212U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache256 KB1.5 MB
L2 cache1 MB24 MB
L3 cache6 MB35.75 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size122 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-6500TE and Xeon Gold 6212U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA-1151FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-6500TE and Xeon Gold 6212U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
SIPP+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Core i5-6500TE and Xeon Gold 6212U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-6500TE and Xeon Gold 6212U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-6500TE and Xeon Gold 6212U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size64 GB1 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 530no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-6500TE and Xeon Gold 6212U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1648

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-6500TE 3.05
Xeon Gold 6212U 17.76
+482%

Xeon Gold 6212U outperforms Core i5-6500TE by 482% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-6500TE 4724
Xeon Gold 6212U 27470
+481%

Xeon Gold 6212U outperforms Core i5-6500TE by 481% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.05 17.76
Recency 19 October 2015 2 April 2019
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 48
Cost $192 $2000
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 165 Watt

The Xeon Gold 6212U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-6500TE in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-6500TE is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6212U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-6500TE and Xeon Gold 6212U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-6500TE
Core i5-6500TE
Intel Xeon Gold 6212U
Xeon Gold 6212U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate Core i5-6500TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 51 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 6212U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-6500TE or Xeon Gold 6212U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.