Celeron 2.30 vs A9-9410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A9-9410 and Celeron 2.30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2382not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-10011
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Northwood (2001−2004)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)March 2003 (21 year ago)
Current price$722 $42

Detailed specifications

A9-9410 and Celeron 2.30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data8 KB
L2 cache2048 KB128 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm130 nm
Die size125 mm2146 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million55 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A9-9410 and Celeron 2.30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP4478
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9410 and Celeron 2.30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,no data
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow-no data
PowerGating-no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect-no data
RAID-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9410 and Celeron 2.30 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
IOMMU 2.0-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9410 and Celeron 2.30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR1, DDR2
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count3no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A9-9410 and Celeron 2.30 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A9-9410 and Celeron 2.30 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9410 and Celeron 2.30.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A9-9410 1527
+932%
Celeron 2.30 148

A9-9410 outperforms Celeron 2.30 by 932% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 73 Watt

We couldn't decide between A9-9410 and Celeron 2.30. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A9-9410 is a notebook processor while Celeron 2.30 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9410 and Celeron 2.30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9410
A9-9410
Intel Celeron 2.30
Celeron 2.30

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 111 votes

Rate A9-9410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 8 votes

Rate Celeron 2.30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9410 or Celeron 2.30, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.