EPYC 7302 vs Core i5-2520M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-2520M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.45
EPYC 7302
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
21.34
+1372%

EPYC 7302 outperforms i5-2520M by a whopping 1372% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-2520M and EPYC 7302 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2101231
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.68
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i5AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225$978
Current price$75 (0.3x MSRP)$884 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-2520M and EPYC 7302 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size149 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors624 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2520M and EPYC 7302 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketPPGA988TR4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2520M and EPYC 7302. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i5-2520M and EPYC 7302 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2520M and EPYC 7302 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2520M and EPYC 7302. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size16 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-2520M and EPYC 7302 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2520M and EPYC 7302.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-2520M 1.45
EPYC 7302 21.34
+1372%

EPYC 7302 outperforms Core i5-2520M by 1372% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-2520M 2235
EPYC 7302 33002
+1377%

EPYC 7302 outperforms Core i5-2520M by 1377% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-2520M 468
EPYC 7302 1163
+149%

EPYC 7302 outperforms Core i5-2520M by 149% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-2520M 933
EPYC 7302 9000
+865%

EPYC 7302 outperforms Core i5-2520M by 865% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.45 21.34
Recency 1 February 2011 7 August 2019
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 32
Cost $225 $978
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 155 Watt

The EPYC 7302 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-2520M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-2520M is a notebook processor while EPYC 7302 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2520M and EPYC 7302, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-2520M
Core i5-2520M
AMD EPYC 7302
EPYC 7302

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 502 votes

Rate Core i5-2520M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 30 votes

Rate EPYC 7302 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-2520M or EPYC 7302, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.