EPYC 7302P vs EPYC 7302

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7302
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
18.84
+1.3%

EPYC 7302 outperforms EPYC 7302P by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking342348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.1311.77
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency5.145.07
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (6 years ago)7 August 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$978$825

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7302P has 16% better value for money than EPYC 7302.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7302 and EPYC 7302P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3232
Base clock speed3 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier3030
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (per die)32 MB (per die)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size4x 74 mm24x 74 mm2
Number of transistors15,200 million15,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7302 and EPYC 7302P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSP3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7302 and EPYC 7302P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7302 and EPYC 7302P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7302 and EPYC 7302P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7302 and EPYC 7302P.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7302 18.84
+1.3%
EPYC 7302P 18.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7302 33106
+1.3%
EPYC 7302P 32690

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7302 1192
+7%
EPYC 7302P 1114

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7302 8664
+16.1%
EPYC 7302P 7462

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.84 18.60

EPYC 7302 has a 1.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD EPYC 7302 and AMD EPYC 7302P.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7302
EPYC 7302
AMD EPYC 7302P
EPYC 7302P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 55 votes

Rate EPYC 7302 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 30 votes

Rate EPYC 7302P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7302 and EPYC 7302P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.