EPYC 7302 vs i5-2500K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-2500K
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.65
EPYC 7302
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
21.24
+702%

EPYC 7302 outperforms Core i5-2500K by a whopping 702% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-2500K and EPYC 7302 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1718261
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.3211.13
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore i5 (Desktop)AMD EPYC
Power efficiency2.5912.73
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date9 January 2011 (13 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$216$978

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7302 has 3378% better value for money than i5-2500K.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-2500K and EPYC 7302 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)8 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size216 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,160 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2500K and EPYC 7302 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketLGA1155TR4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2500K and EPYC 7302. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i5-2500K and EPYC 7302 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2500K and EPYC 7302 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2500K and EPYC 7302. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size32 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-2500K and EPYC 7302 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2500K and EPYC 7302.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-2500K 2.65
EPYC 7302 21.24
+702%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-2500K 4123
EPYC 7302 33106
+703%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-2500K 652
EPYC 7302 1209
+85.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-2500K 1920
EPYC 7302 8691
+353%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.65 21.24
Recency 9 January 2011 7 August 2019
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 155 Watt

i5-2500K has 63.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7302, on the other hand, has a 701.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7302 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-2500K in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-2500K is a desktop processor while EPYC 7302 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2500K and EPYC 7302, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-2500K
Core i5-2500K
AMD EPYC 7302
EPYC 7302

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1786 votes

Rate Core i5-2500K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 30 votes

Rate EPYC 7302 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-2500K or EPYC 7302, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.