i5-520UM vs i5-13400

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13400
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.60
+2461%
Core i5-520UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.57

Core i5-13400 outperforms Core i5-520UM by a whopping 2461% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13400 and Core i5-520UM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4852811
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation44.10no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Power efficiency21.263.00
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$221$241

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13400 and Core i5-520UM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.07 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz1.87 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data8
L1 cache80K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)3 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm32 nm
Die size257 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13400 and Core i5-520UM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1700BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400 and Core i5-520UM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0+
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-13400 and Core i5-520UM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400 and Core i5-520UM are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400 and Core i5-520UM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR3-800
Maximum memory size192 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 730Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.55 GHz500 MHz
Execution Units24no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-13400 and Core i5-520UM integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported42

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-13400 and Core i5-520UM integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-13400 and Core i5-520UM integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400 and Core i5-520UM.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13400 14.60
+2461%
i5-520UM 0.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13400 23191
+2454%
i5-520UM 908

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-13400 8721
+349%
i5-520UM 1943

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-13400 51095
+1252%
i5-520UM 3778

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i5-13400 13632
+814%
i5-520UM 1492

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-13400 3.47
+913%
i5-520UM 35.15

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-13400 27
+2180%
i5-520UM 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.60 0.57
Recency 4 January 2023 7 January 2010
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 16 4
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 18 Watt

i5-13400 has a 2461.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and 400% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

i5-520UM, on the other hand, has 261.1% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-520UM in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-13400 is a desktop processor while Core i5-520UM is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400 and Core i5-520UM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13400
Core i5-13400
Intel Core i5-520UM
Core i5-520UM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1075 votes

Rate Core i5-13400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Core i5-520UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13400 or Core i5-520UM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.