Pentium Dual Core T4400 vs Core i3-7020U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-7020U
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.67
+101%
Pentium Dual Core T4400
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.83

i3-7020U outperforms Pentium Dual T4400 by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-7020U and Pentium Dual Core T4400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20252536
Place by popularity95not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Pentium Dual Core
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date10 April 2018 (6 years ago)1 December 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-7020U and Pentium Dual Core T4400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/s800 MHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache3 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-7020U and Pentium Dual Core T4400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1356P
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7020U and Pentium Dual Core T4400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7020U and Pentium Dual Core T4400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7020U and Pentium Dual Core T4400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 620On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7020U and Pentium Dual Core T4400.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-7020U 1.67
+101%
Pentium Dual T4400 0.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-7020U 2580
+101%
Pentium Dual T4400 1284

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i3-7020U 3588
+60.8%
Pentium Dual T4400 2231

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i3-7020U 8083
+92.5%
Pentium Dual T4400 4200

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.67 0.83
Recency 10 April 2018 1 December 2009
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

i3-7020U has a 101.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-7020U is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium Dual Core T4400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7020U and Pentium Dual Core T4400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-7020U
Core i3-7020U
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400
Pentium Dual Core T4400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1211 votes

Rate Core i3-7020U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 210 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-7020U or Pentium Dual Core T4400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.