Core 2 Duo P8600 vs Core i3-7020U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-7020U
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.67
+204%

i3-7020U outperforms Core 2 Duo P8600 by a whopping 204% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-7020U and Core 2 Duo P8600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20252791
Place by popularity95not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date10 April 2018 (6 years ago)15 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$209

Detailed specifications

Core i3-7020U and Core 2 Duo P8600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/s1066 MHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB3 MB
L3 cache3 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data274 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-7020U and Core 2 Duo P8600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketBGA1356Socket P (BGA479, PGA478)
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7020U and Core 2 Duo P8600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7020U and Core 2 Duo P8600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7020U and Core 2 Duo P8600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 620no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7020U and Core 2 Duo P8600.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-7020U 1.67
+204%
Core 2 Duo P8600 0.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-7020U 2580
+206%
Core 2 Duo P8600 844

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-7020U 740
+166%
Core 2 Duo P8600 278

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-7020U 1495
+220%
Core 2 Duo P8600 467

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i3-7020U 3588
+37.1%
Core 2 Duo P8600 2618

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i3-7020U 8083
+64.6%
Core 2 Duo P8600 4910

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i3-7020U 227
+92.4%
Core 2 Duo P8600 118

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i3-7020U 93
+43.1%
Core 2 Duo P8600 65

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

i3-7020U 4821
+109%
Core 2 Duo P8600 2302

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

i3-7020U 2221
+78%
Core 2 Duo P8600 1248

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.67 0.55
Recency 10 April 2018 15 July 2008
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

i3-7020U has a 203.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-7020U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo P8600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7020U and Core 2 Duo P8600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-7020U
Core i3-7020U
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
Core 2 Duo P8600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1211 votes

Rate Core i3-7020U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 144 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P8600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-7020U or Core 2 Duo P8600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.