A9-9410 vs Core i3-6100H
Aggregate performance score
i3-6100H outperforms A9-9410 by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-6100H and A9-9410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1862 | 2386 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i3 | AMD Bristol Ridge |
Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
Release date | 1 September 2015 (8 years ago) | 1 June 2016 (8 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $225 | no data |
Current price | no data | $722 |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-6100H and A9-9410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 160 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 3 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 99 mm2 | 124.5 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 90 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 1200 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-6100H and A9-9410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | BGA | BGA |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10-25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-6100H and A9-9410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization, |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | no data | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-6100H and A9-9410 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-6100H and A9-9410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 530 | AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-6100H and A9-9410.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i3-6100H outperforms A9-9410 by 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i3-6100H outperforms A9-9410 by 99% in Passmark.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Core i3-6100H outperforms A9-9410 by 63% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core i3-6100H outperforms A9-9410 by 116% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core i3-6100H outperforms A9-9410 by 56% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Core i3-6100H outperforms A9-9410 by 103% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Core i3-6100H outperforms A9-9410 by 125% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Core i3-6100H outperforms A9-9410 by 71% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Core i3-6100H outperforms A9-9410 by 59% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.
TrueCrypt AES
TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Core i3-6100H outperforms A9-9410 by 70% in TrueCrypt AES.
WinRAR 4.0
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Core i3-6100H outperforms A9-9410 by 127% in WinRAR 4.0.
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
Benchmark coverage: 5%
Core i3-6100H outperforms A9-9410 by 48% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
Benchmark coverage: 5%
Core i3-6100H outperforms A9-9410 by 9% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.97 | 0.99 |
Integrated graphics card | 2.59 | 1.33 |
Recency | 1 September 2015 | 1 June 2016 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
i3-6100H has a 99% higher aggregate performance score, 94.7% faster integrated GPU, 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
A9-9410, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 250% lower power consumption.
The Core i3-6100H is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9410 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-6100H and A9-9410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.