Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U vs Core i3-5005U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-5005U
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.31
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.30
+228%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-5005U by a whopping 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-5005U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21771295
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameBroadwell-U (2015)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date1 March 2015 (9 years ago)26 October 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$275no data
Current price$342 (1.2x MSRP)$611

Detailed specifications

Core i3-5005U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size82 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1300 Million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-5005U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1168FP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-5005U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Response+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i3-5005U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-5005U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-5005U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 5500AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency850 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-5005U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-5005U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-5005U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-5005U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1212

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-5005U 1.31
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 4.30
+228%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-5005U by 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-5005U 2022
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 6654
+229%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-5005U by 229% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-5005U 617
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 887
+43.8%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-5005U by 44% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-5005U 1241
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 2554
+106%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-5005U by 106% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i3-5005U 3133
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 4349
+38.8%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-5005U by 39% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i3-5005U 6927
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 14336
+107%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-5005U by 107% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i3-5005U 2713
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 5635
+108%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-5005U by 108% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i3-5005U 24.41
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 12.36
+97.5%

Core i3-5005U outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U by 97% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i3-5005U 2
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 6
+167%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-5005U by 167% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i3-5005U 208
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 553
+166%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-5005U by 166% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i3-5005U 82
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 134
+63.4%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-5005U by 63% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i3-5005U 0.95
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 1.55
+63.2%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-5005U by 63% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-5005U 1.2
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 3.4
+183%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-5005U by 183% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-5005U 1952
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 2700
+38.3%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-5005U by 38% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-5005U 13
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 34
+162%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-5005U by 162% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-5005U 70
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 98
+40.2%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-5005U by 40% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i3-5005U 4075
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 12422
+205%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-5005U by 205% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i3-5005U 1912
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 3326
+74%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-5005U by 74% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i3-5005U 4343
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 11156
+157%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-5005U by 157% in Geekbench 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.31 4.30
Integrated graphics card 1.50 4.50
Recency 1 March 2015 26 October 2017
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 8

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-5005U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-5005U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-5005U
Core i3-5005U
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 926 votes

Rate Core i3-5005U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 98 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-5005U or Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.