Celeron 857 vs i3-4110M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4110M
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 37 Watt
1.69
+369%
Celeron 857
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.36

Core i3-4110M outperforms Celeron 857 by a whopping 369% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4110M and Celeron 857 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20523038
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Celeron
Power efficiency4.322.00
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date14 April 2014 (10 years ago)1 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225$134

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4110M and Celeron 857 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size130 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors960 Million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4110M and Celeron 857 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA946FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4110M and Celeron 857. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i3-4110M and Celeron 857 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4110M and Celeron 857 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4110M and Celeron 857. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4600Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz1 GHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4110M and Celeron 857 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
VGA+no data
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4110M and Celeron 857 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA2880x1800@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-4110M and Celeron 857 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4110M and Celeron 857.

PCIe version22.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-4110M 1.69
+369%
Celeron 857 0.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-4110M 2678
+371%
Celeron 857 569

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 0.36
Integrated graphics card 1.84 0.77
Recency 14 April 2014 1 July 2011
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 17 Watt

i3-4110M has a 369.4% higher aggregate performance score, 139% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 857, on the other hand, has 117.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-4110M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 857 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4110M and Celeron 857, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4110M
Core i3-4110M
Intel Celeron 857
Celeron 857

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Core i3-4110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Celeron 857 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4110M or Celeron 857, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.