Pentium N3540 vs i3-330E
Aggregate performance score
Core i3-330E outperforms Pentium N3540 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-330E and Pentium N3540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2602 | 2640 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i3 | Intel Pentium |
| Power efficiency | 2.14 | 9.48 |
| Architecture codename | Westmere (2010−2011) | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 7 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 22 May 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $177 | $251 |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-330E and Pentium N3540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.16 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.03 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 1.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 1 × 2.5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 16 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 224 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 81 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C for rPGA,105 °C for BGA | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-330E and Pentium N3540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1288 | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 7.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-330E and Pentium N3540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| FMA | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
| Smart Connect | no data | + |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i3-330E and Pentium N3540 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-330E and Pentium N3540 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | - |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-330E and Pentium N3540. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-800, DDR3-1066 | DDR3L-1333 |
| Maximum memory size | 8.79 GB | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 17.051 GB/s | 21.32 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 667 MHz | 896 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-330E and Pentium N3540 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i3-330E and Pentium N3540 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 11.2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-330E and Pentium N3540.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 4 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 and 2.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 5 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.82 | 0.78 |
| Recency | 7 January 2010 | 22 May 2014 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 7 Watt |
i3-330E has a 5.1% higher aggregate performance score.
Pentium N3540, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i3-330E and Pentium N3540.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-330E and Pentium N3540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
