Celeron M 550 vs Atom x5-Z8350

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron M 550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2818not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series5x Intel AtomCeleron M
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2015−2016)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date8 February 2016 (8 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron M 550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.44 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.92 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron M 550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketUTFCBGA592no data
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron M 550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron M 550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Boot+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron M 550 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron M 550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types4 GBno data
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphicsno data
Max video memory2 GBno data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron M 550 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron M 550 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron M 550.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes1no data
USB revision3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-Z8350 892
+91.8%
Celeron M 550 465

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom x5-Z8350 903
Celeron M 550 1834
+103%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm

Atom x5-Z8350 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron M 550. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron M 550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Atom x5-Z8350
Intel Celeron M 550
Celeron M 550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 376 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 28 votes

Rate Celeron M 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-Z8350 or Celeron M 550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.