Xeon E3-1220L vs i3-3250T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-3250T
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.72
+15.4%

i3-3250T outperforms Xeon E3-1220L by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3250T and Xeon E3-1220L processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20252139
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date9 June 2013 (11 years ago)3 April 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3250T and Xeon E3-1220L basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size94 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data78 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3250T and Xeon E3-1220L compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt20 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3250T and Xeon E3-1220L. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FDI+-
Fast Memory Accessno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i3-3250T and Xeon E3-1220L technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key-no data
Identity Protection++
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3250T and Xeon E3-1220L are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3250T and Xeon E3-1220L. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333, DDR3-1600DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2500no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3250T and Xeon E3-1220L integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3250T and Xeon E3-1220L.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3250T 1.72
+15.4%
Xeon E3-1220L 1.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-3250T 2650
+15.5%
Xeon E3-1220L 2295

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.72 1.49
Recency 9 June 2013 3 April 2011
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 20 Watt

i3-3250T has a 15.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E3-1220L, on the other hand, has 75% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-3250T is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1220L in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-3250T is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1220L is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3250T and Xeon E3-1220L, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3250T
Core i3-3250T
Intel Xeon E3-1220L
Xeon E3-1220L

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Core i3-3250T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1220L on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3250T or Xeon E3-1220L, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.