Athlon X4 970 vs Core i3-3250T

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i3-3250T
2013
2 cores / 4 threads
1.71
Athlon X4 970
2017
4 cores / 4 threads
1.71

Primary Details

Comparing Core i3-3250T and Athlon X4 970 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19251928
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation2.22no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameno dataBristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 April 2013 (11 years ago)27 July 2017 (6 years ago)
Current price$80 $59

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

Core i3-3250T and Athlon X4 970 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB Intel® Smart Cache0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3250T and Athlon X4 970 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3250T and Athlon X4 970. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI-+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i3-3250T and Athlon X4 970 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key-no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3250T and Athlon X4 970 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3250T and Athlon X4 970. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333, DDR3-1600DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2500no data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3250T and Athlon X4 970 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3250T and Athlon X4 970.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3250T 1.71
Athlon X4 970 1.71

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-3250T 2650
+0.2%
Athlon X4 970 2644

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 1 April 2013 27 July 2017
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i3-3250T and Athlon X4 970.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3250T and Athlon X4 970, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3250T
Core i3-3250T
AMD Athlon X4 970
Athlon X4 970

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Core i3-3250T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 103 votes

Rate Athlon X4 970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3250T or Athlon X4 970, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.