Celeron G1101 vs i3-3250

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-3250
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 55 Watt
1.54
+126%
Celeron G1101
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 73 Watt
0.68

Core i3-3250 outperforms Celeron G1101 by a whopping 126% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3250 and Celeron G1101 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21222719
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.200.97
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.650.88
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Release date9 June 2013 (11 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$138$85

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G1101 has 385% better value for money than i3-3250.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3250 and Celeron G1101 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz0.27 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size94 mm281 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data382 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3250 and Celeron G1101 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3250 and Celeron G1101. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AVX+-
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI++

Security technologies

Core i3-3250 and Celeron G1101 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key-no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3250 and Celeron G1101 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3250 and Celeron G1101. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333, DDR3-1600DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16.38 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s17 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2500Intel HD
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3250 and Celeron G1101 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3250 and Celeron G1101.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes161

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3250 1.54
+126%
Celeron G1101 0.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-3250 2442
+125%
Celeron G1101 1086

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.54 0.68
Recency 9 June 2013 7 January 2010
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 73 Watt

i3-3250 has a 126.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more threads, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 32.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-3250 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1101 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3250 and Celeron G1101, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3250
Core i3-3250
Intel Celeron G1101
Celeron G1101

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 199 votes

Rate Core i3-3250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G1101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3250 or Celeron G1101, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.