i3-550 vs i3-3250

Place in the ranking	2135	2462
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.21	0.12
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Power efficiency	2.65	1.31
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Release date	9 June 2013 (11 years ago)	30 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$138	$101

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-3250 has 75% better value for money than i3-550.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3250 and Core i3-550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	3.5 GHz	3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.5 GHz	3.2 GHz
Bus rate	5 GT/s	2.5 GT/s
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	256 KB (per core)
L3 cache	3 MB (shared)	4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	32 nm
Die size	94 mm²	81 mm²
Maximum core temperature	no data	73 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	65 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	382 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3250 and Core i3-550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCLGA1155	FCLGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3250 and Core i3-550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX	Intel® SSE4.2
AVX	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
My WiFi	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	+
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Demand Based Switching	no data	-
PAE	no data	36 Bit
FDI	+	+

Security technologies

Core i3-3250 and Core i3-550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	-
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	-	no data
Identity Protection	+	-
Anti-Theft	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3250 and Core i3-550 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3250 and Core i3-550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600	DDR3
Maximum memory size	32 GB	16.38 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	21 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics 2500	Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Clear Video HD	+	+
Graphics max frequency	1.05 GHz	no data
InTru 3D	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3250 and Core i3-550 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3250 and Core i3-550.

PCIe version	2.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	16	16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3250 1.54
+52.5%

i3-550 1.01

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-3250 2442
+51.8%

i3-550 1609

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-3250 580
+35.5%

i3-550 428

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-3250 1180
+35.3%

i3-550 872

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.54	1.01
Integrated graphics card	0.69	0.77
Recency	9 June 2013	30 May 2010
Chip lithography	22 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	73 Watt

i3-3250 has a 52.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 32.7% lower power consumption.

i3-550, on the other hand, has 11.6% faster integrated GPU.

The Core i3-3250 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-550 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3250 and Core i3-550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.