GX-210JA vs i3-3225
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-3225 and GX-210JA processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2203 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.06 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | AMD |
Power efficiency | 2.43 | no data |
Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Temash (2013) |
Release date | 3 September 2012 (12 years ago) | 23 May 2013 (11 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $264 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-3225 and GX-210JA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 1 GHz |
Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 118 mm2 | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-3225 and GX-210JA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FCLGA1155 | FT3 BGA |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3225 and GX-210JA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
My WiFi | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
FDI | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i3-3225 and GX-210JA technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | - | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
Anti-Theft | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3225 and GX-210JA are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3225 and GX-210JA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | no data |
InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3225 and GX-210JA integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3225 and GX-210JA.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 3 September 2012 | 23 May 2013 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 6 Watt |
i3-3225 has 100% more threads, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.
GX-210JA, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 816.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-3225 and GX-210JA. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i3-3225 is a desktop processor while GX-210JA is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3225 and GX-210JA, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.