Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 vs i3-3210

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-3210
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 55 Watt
1.40
+198%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 32 Watt
0.47

Core i3-3210 outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 by a whopping 198% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3210 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22112908
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno data2x AMD Turion Ultra
Power efficiency2.411.39
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Puma (2008−2009)
Release date1 January 2013 (11 years ago)3 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$120no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3210 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s3600 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache3072 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Die size94 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3210 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt32 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3210 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
AVX+-
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-3210 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key-no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3210 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3210 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2500no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3210 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3210 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80.

PCIe version2.0no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.40 0.47
Recency 1 January 2013 3 June 2008
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 32 Watt

i3-3210 has a 197.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, and a 195.5% more advanced lithography process.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80, on the other hand, has 71.9% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-3210 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-3210 is a desktop processor while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3210 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3210
Core i3-3210
AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 266 votes

Rate Core i3-3210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 9 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3210 or Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.