Xeon Gold 5218T vs Core i3-3130M
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 5218T outperforms i3-3130M by a whopping 1027% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-3130M and Xeon Gold 5218T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2237 | 498 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core i3 | Intel Xeon Gold |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 1 January 2013 (11 years ago) | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $225 | $1,561 |
| Current price | $136 (0.6x MSRP) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-3130M and Xeon Gold 5218T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 1 MB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 22 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 118 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90C (PGA); 105C (BGA) | 93 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-3130M and Xeon Gold 5218T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 4 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | FCBGA1023,FCPGA988 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3130M and Xeon Gold 5218T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| My WiFi | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | Launched |
Security technologies
Core i3-3130M and Xeon Gold 5218T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Identity Protection | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3130M and Xeon Gold 5218T are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3130M and Xeon Gold 5218T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2667 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 128.001 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.1 GHz | no data |
| InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3130M and Xeon Gold 5218T integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | no data |
| SDVO | + | no data |
| CRT | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3130M and Xeon Gold 5218T.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 48 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon Gold 5218T outperforms Core i3-3130M by 1027% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon Gold 5218T outperforms Core i3-3130M by 1028% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.23 | 13.86 |
| Recency | 1 January 2013 | 2 April 2019 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Cost | $225 | $1561 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 105 Watt |
The Xeon Gold 5218T is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3130M in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i3-3130M is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5218T is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3130M and Xeon Gold 5218T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
