Core i3-3130M vs Core i5-2510E

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i5-2510E
2011
2 cores / 4 threads
1.21
Core i3-3130M
2013
2 cores / 4 threads
1.22
+0.8%

Core i3-3130M outperforms Core i5-2510E by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core i5-2510E and Core i3-3130M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22092204
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Core i3
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)1 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$266$225
Current price$422 (1.6x MSRP)$136 (0.6x MSRP)

Technical specs

Core i5-2510E and Core i3-3130M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus support4 × 5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size149 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90C (PGA); 105C (BGA)
Number of transistors624 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2510E and Core i3-3130M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988FCBGA1023,FCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2510E and Core i3-3130M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® AVX
AES-NI+-
FMA+no data
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switching--
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i5-2510E and Core i3-3130M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDBno data+
Identity Protection++
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2510E and Core i3-3130M are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2510E and Core i3-3130M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16.6 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000Intel HD Graphics 4000
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz1.1 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-2510E and Core i3-3130M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
SDVO++
CRT++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2510E and Core i3-3130M.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-2510E 1.21
i3-3130M 1.22
+0.8%

Core i3-3130M outperforms Core i5-2510E by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-2510E 1889
i3-3130M 1900
+0.6%

Core i3-3130M outperforms Core i5-2510E by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.21 1.22
Integrated graphics card 0.66 1.17
Recency 1 February 2011 1 January 2013
Cost $266 $225
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm

We couldn't decide between Core i5-2510E and Core i3-3130M. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2510E and Core i3-3130M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-2510E
Core i5-2510E
Intel Core i3-3130M
Core i3-3130M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Core i5-2510E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 16 votes

Rate Core i3-3130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-2510E or Core i3-3130M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.