Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Core i3-2367M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-2367M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.55
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
54.15
+9745%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms i3-2367M by a whopping 9745% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2367M and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking274022
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.03
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date27 June 2011 (13 years ago)14 June 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$250$5,500
Current price$375 (1.5x MSRP)$6095 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2367M and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB4 MB
L2 cache512 KB32 MB
L3 cache3 MB256 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size149 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors624 Million3800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2367M and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023sWRX8
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2367M and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2
AES-NIno data+
FMA+no data
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2367M and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2367M and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s204.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2367M and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-2367M 0.55
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 54.15
+9745%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i3-2367M by 9745% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-2367M 843
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 83761
+9836%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i3-2367M by 9836% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-2367M 227
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 1602
+606%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i3-2367M by 606% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-2367M 492
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 14556
+2859%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i3-2367M by 2859% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i3-2367M 1827
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 5596
+206%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i3-2367M by 206% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i3-2367M 4108
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 52743
+1184%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i3-2367M by 1184% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i3-2367M 1689
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 16656
+886%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i3-2367M by 886% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i3-2367M 39.19
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 6.11
+541%

Core i3-2367M outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX by 541% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i3-2367M 1
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 54
+3952%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i3-2367M by 3952% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i3-2367M 0.55
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 2.12
+285%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i3-2367M by 285% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-2367M 0.1
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 26
+21567%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i3-2367M by 21567% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-2367M 1537
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 6689
+335%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i3-2367M by 335% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-2367M 7
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 193
+2494%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i3-2367M by 2494% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-2367M 40
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 264
+553%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i3-2367M by 553% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 54.15
Recency 27 June 2011 14 June 2020
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 4 128
Cost $250 $5500
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 280 Watt

i3-2367M has its recommended price lower by $5250, and 1547.1% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, on the other hand, has a 9745.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 3100% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2367M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-2367M is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2367M and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-2367M
Core i3-2367M
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 41 vote

Rate Core i3-2367M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 823 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-2367M or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.