Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 SoloAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)4 June 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads124
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L2 cache3 MBno data
L3 cacheno data36 MB
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956no data
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXDNA 2 NPU

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 August 2008 4 June 2024
Physical cores 1 12
Threads 1 24
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 55 Watt

Core 2 Solo SU3300 has 1000% lower power consumption.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300
Core 2 Solo SU3300
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 170
Ryzen AI 9 HX 170

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 7 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Solo SU3300 or Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.