Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Solo SU3300
2008, $262
1 core / 1 thread, 3 Watt
0.15
Ryzen AI 9 365
2024
10 cores / 20 threads, 28 Watt
17.09
+11293%

Ryzen AI 9 365 outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3300 by a whopping 11293% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3578430
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Solono data
Power efficiencyno data65.58
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Strix Point (2024−2025)
Release date20 August 2008 (17 years ago)July 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen AI 9 365 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads120
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die size107 mm2233 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen AI 9 365 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956FP8
Power consumption (TDP)3 MB28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen AI 9 365. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen AI 9 365 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen AI 9 365. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen AI 9 365.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 0.15
Ryzen AI 9 365 17.09
+11293%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 1247
Ryzen AI 9 365 8446
+577%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 1247
Ryzen AI 9 365 45453
+3545%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 564
Ryzen AI 9 365 14361
+2446%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 17.09
Physical cores 1 10
Threads 1 20
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 28 Watt

Core 2 Solo SU3300 has 833.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen AI 9 365, on the other hand, has a 11293.3% higher aggregate performance score, 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300
Core 2 Solo SU3300
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Ryzen AI 9 365

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 8 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 206 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen AI 9 365, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.