Mobile Sempron SI-42 vs Core 2 Quad Q9100

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9100
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.21
+476%
Mobile Sempron SI-42
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.21

Core 2 Quad Q9100 outperforms Mobile Sempron SI-42 by a whopping 476% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9100 and Mobile Sempron SI-42 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23453219
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore 2 QuadAMD Mobile Sempron
Power efficiency2.540.79
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Sable (2008−2009)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9100 and Mobile Sempron SI-42 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.26 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.26 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz1800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache6 MB (per die)512 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9100 and Mobile Sempron SI-42 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketPGA478S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9100 and Mobile Sempron SI-42. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
AMT+no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9100 and Mobile Sempron SI-42 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9100 and Mobile Sempron SI-42 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9100 1.21
+476%
Mobile Sempron SI-42 0.21

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Quad Q9100 3310
+321%
Mobile Sempron SI-42 787

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.21 0.21
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 25 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9100 has a 476.2% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Mobile Sempron SI-42, on the other hand, has 80% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Quad Q9100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron SI-42 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9100 and Mobile Sempron SI-42, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9100
Core 2 Quad Q9100
AMD Mobile Sempron SI-42
Mobile Sempron SI-42

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 47 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 14 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron SI-42 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9100 or Mobile Sempron SI-42, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.