Athlon 64 FX-72 vs Core 2 Quad Q8300

Place in the ranking	2346	2386
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Power efficiency	1.19	0.86
Architecture codename	Yorkfield (2007−2009)	Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date	November 2008 (16 years ago)	November 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Athlon 64 FX-72 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	2.5 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.5 GHz	2.8 GHz
Bus rate	1333 MHz	no data
L1 cache	64K (per core)	128 KB
L2 cache	4 MB (shared)	1 MB
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	45 nm	90 nm
Die size	2x 81 mm²	235 mm²
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	71 °C	no data
Number of transistors	456 million	227 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	0.85V-1.3625V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Athlon 64 FX-72 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	LGA775	F
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Athlon 64 FX-72. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Athlon 64 FX-72 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Athlon 64 FX-72. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

DDR1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q8300 1.19
+5.3%

Athlon 64 FX-72 1.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q8300 1891
+5.4%

Athlon 64 FX-72 1794

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.19	1.13
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Chip lithography	45 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	125 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q8300 has a 5.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 31.6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Athlon 64 FX-72.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Athlon 64 FX-72, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.