Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Core 2 Extreme QX9300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme QX9300
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.17
+95%
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 125 Watt
0.60

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 6000+ by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22742690
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCore 2 Extremeno data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Windsor (2006−2009)
Release dateAugust 2008 (15 years ago)August 2007 (16 years ago)
Current price$844 $89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.53 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus support1066 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB256 KB
L2 cache12 MB512K
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2220 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketPGA478AM2
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
AMT+no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 1.17
+95%
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 0.60

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 6000+ by 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 1805
+93.3%
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 934

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 6000+ by 93% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 0.60
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 125 Watt

The Core 2 Extreme QX9300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Extreme QX9300 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300
Core 2 Extreme QX9300
AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Athlon 64 X2 6000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 90 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 304 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX9300 or Athlon 64 X2 6000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.