Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Core 2 Duo T5200
General info
Comparing Core 2 Duo T5200 and Athlon Neo MV-40 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Core 2 Duo | AMD Athlon Neo |
Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Huron (2009) |
Release date | July 2006 (17 years ago) | 6 January 2009 (15 years ago) |
Current price | $25 | $85 |
Technical specs
Core 2 Duo T5200 and Athlon Neo MV-40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.66 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Bus support | 533 MHz | 1600 MHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | 143 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 85 °C | 95 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
VID voltage range | 1.075V-1.175V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T5200 and Athlon Neo MV-40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | 479 | ASB1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 34 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T5200 and Athlon Neo MV-40. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization |
VirusProtect | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo T5200 and Athlon Neo MV-40 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T5200 and Athlon Neo MV-40 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | no data | + |
VT-x | - | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core 2 Duo T5200 outperforms Athlon Neo MV-40 by 71% in Passmark.
Advantages and disadvantages
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 34 Watt | 15 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T5200 and Athlon Neo MV-40. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T5200 and Athlon Neo MV-40, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.