VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo SU7300 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | C7-M |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Esther |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (14 years ago) | no data |
| Current price | $280 | $350 |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo SU7300 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus support | 800 MHz | 400 MHz |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo SU7300 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA956 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 12 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo SU7300 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 outperforms Core 2 Duo SU7300 by 210% in wPrime 32.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 12 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo SU7300 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1600. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SU7300 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
