Core 2 Duo P7550 vs Core 2 Duo P8700

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core 2 Duo P8700
2009
2 cores / 2 threads
0.63
+12.5%
Core 2 Duo P7550
2009
2 cores / 2 threads
0.56

Core 2 Duo P8700 outperforms Core 2 Duo P7550 by 13% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core 2 Duo P8700 and Core 2 Duo P7550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26362680
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)1 October 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$209no data
Current price$71 (0.3x MSRP)$169

Technical specs

Core 2 Duo P8700 and Core 2 Duo P7550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.53 GHz2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz2.26 GHz
Bus support1066 MHz1066 MHz
L2 cache3 MB3 MB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache3 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistors410 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1V - 1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P8700 and Core 2 Duo P7550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA479,PGA478PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P8700 and Core 2 Duo P7550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P8700 and Core 2 Duo P7550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P8700 and Core 2 Duo P7550 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo P8700 0.63
+12.5%
Core 2 Duo P7550 0.56

Core 2 Duo P8700 outperforms Core 2 Duo P7550 by 13% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo P8700 967
+11.8%
Core 2 Duo P7550 865

Core 2 Duo P8700 outperforms Core 2 Duo P7550 by 12% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo P8700 304
+7.8%
Core 2 Duo P7550 282

Core 2 Duo P8700 outperforms Core 2 Duo P7550 by 8% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo P8700 488
+5.2%
Core 2 Duo P7550 464

Core 2 Duo P8700 outperforms Core 2 Duo P7550 by 5% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Duo P8700 2805
+15%
Core 2 Duo P7550 2439

Core 2 Duo P8700 outperforms Core 2 Duo P7550 by 15% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo P8700 5169
+11.3%
Core 2 Duo P7550 4645

Core 2 Duo P8700 outperforms Core 2 Duo P7550 by 11% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo P8700 2254
+12.5%
Core 2 Duo P7550 2004

Core 2 Duo P8700 outperforms Core 2 Duo P7550 by 12% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Core 2 Duo P8700 31.6
+12.7%
Core 2 Duo P7550 35.6

Core 2 Duo P7550 outperforms Core 2 Duo P8700 by 13% in wPrime 32.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.63 0.56
Recency 1 January 2009 1 October 2009

The Core 2 Duo P8700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo P7550 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P8700 and Core 2 Duo P7550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P8700
Core 2 Duo P8700
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550
Core 2 Duo P7550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 163 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P8700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 13 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P7550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P8700 or Core 2 Duo P7550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.