Pentium Dual Core T4500 vs Core 2 Duo P7550

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo P7550
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.53
Pentium Dual Core T4500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.84
+58.5%

Pentium Dual Core T4500 outperforms Core 2 Duo P7550 by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P7550 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28592585
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Pentium Dual Core
Power efficiency2.012.27
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 October 2009 (15 years ago)1 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P7550 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.26 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.26 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache3 MB1 MB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P7550 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478P
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P7550 and Pentium Dual Core T4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P7550 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo P7550 and Pentium Dual Core T4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo P7550 0.53
Pentium Dual T4500 0.84
+58.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo P7550 849
Pentium Dual T4500 1336
+57.4%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo P7550 2439
+4.6%
Pentium Dual T4500 2331

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo P7550 4645
+7.1%
Pentium Dual T4500 4337

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo P7550 2004
+5.6%
Pentium Dual T4500 1898

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Duo P7550 35.6
+0.3%
Pentium Dual T4500 35.7

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 0.84
Recency 1 October 2009 1 January 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Duo P7550 has 40% lower power consumption.

Pentium Dual T4500, on the other hand, has a 58.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 months.

The Pentium Dual Core T4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo P7550 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P7550 and Pentium Dual Core T4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P7550
Core 2 Duo P7550
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
Pentium Dual Core T4500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 14 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P7550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 441 vote

Rate Pentium Dual Core T4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P7550 or Pentium Dual Core T4500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.