Turion Neo X2 L625 vs Core 2 Duo P7370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo P7370
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.50
+85.2%
Turion Neo X2 L625
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.27

Core 2 Duo P7370 outperforms Turion Neo X2 L625 by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P7370 and Turion Neo X2 L625 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28953141
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo2x AMD Turion Neo
Power efficiency1.891.42
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Congo (2009)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)1 October 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P7370 and Turion Neo X2 L625 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache3 MB1 MB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P7370 and Turion Neo X2 L625 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478ASB1 BGA
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P7370 and Turion Neo X2 L625. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHyperTransport 3.0, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P7370 and Turion Neo X2 L625 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P7370 and Turion Neo X2 L625 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo P7370 0.50
+85.2%
Turion Neo X2 L625 0.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo P7370 790
+82.9%
Turion Neo X2 L625 432

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo P7370 2191
+66.9%
Turion Neo X2 L625 1313

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo P7370 4022
+58.5%
Turion Neo X2 L625 2538

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo P7370 1712
+46.7%
Turion Neo X2 L625 1167

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.50 0.27
Recency 1 January 2009 1 October 2009
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 18 Watt

Core 2 Duo P7370 has a 85.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Turion Neo X2 L625, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 38.9% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo P7370 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion Neo X2 L625 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P7370 and Turion Neo X2 L625, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P7370
Core 2 Duo P7370
AMD Turion Neo X2 L625
Turion Neo X2 L625

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo P7370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Turion Neo X2 L625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P7370 or Turion Neo X2 L625, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.