Xeon Platinum 8352Y vs Celeron T3000
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8352Y outperforms Celeron T3000 by a whopping 9949% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron T3000 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2951 | 52 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 19.95 |
| Release date | 1 April 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron T3000 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 48 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 81 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1V-1.25V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron T3000 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PGA478 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T3000 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron T3000 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T3000 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron T3000 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron T3000 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.43 | 43.21 |
| Recency | 1 April 2009 | 1 April 2021 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 32 |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 205 Watt |
Celeron T3000 has 485.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8352Y, on the other hand, has a 9948.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron T3000 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron T3000 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8352Y is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T3000 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
