Ryzen 7 7840U vs Celeron SU2300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 7 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated382
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Architecture codenameno dataPhoenix-U (Zen 4)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)May 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$22 no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 7 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data8 (Octa-Core)
Threadsno data16
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speedno data5.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 7 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956FP8
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 7 7840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 7 7840U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 7 7840U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 7 7840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-5600

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 7 7840U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron SU2300 482
Ryzen 7 7840U 25007
+5088%

Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms Celeron SU2300 by 5088% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron SU2300 160
Ryzen 7 7840U 2089
+1206%

Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms Celeron SU2300 by 1206% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron SU2300 278
Ryzen 7 7840U 8714
+3035%

Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms Celeron SU2300 by 3035% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 28 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 7 7840U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 7 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron SU2300
Celeron SU2300
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
Ryzen 7 7840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 3 votes

Rate Celeron SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 163 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron SU2300 or Ryzen 7 7840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.