Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Celeron T1600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron T1600 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated242
Place by popularitynot in top-10015
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data38.03
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data17.02
Architecture codenameno dataRaphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron T1600 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data8 (Octa-Core)
Threadsno data16
Base clock speed1.66 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data5 GHz
Bus rateno data162 MHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache96 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data71 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C89 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistorsno data6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1.075V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T1600 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478AM5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T1600 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron T1600 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T1600 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron T1600 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-5200

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron T1600 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron T1600 551
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 34274
+6120%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron T1600 192
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 2726
+1320%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron T1600 353
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 15158
+4194%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 120 Watt

Celeron T1600 has 242.9% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 7800X3D, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron T1600 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron T1600 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T1600 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron T1600
Celeron T1600
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron T1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1991 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 7800X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron T1600 or Ryzen 7 7800X3D, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.