Ryzen 9 5900X vs Celeron N3050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3050 and Ryzen 9 5900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated175
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.98
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 9
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Vermeer (Zen3) (2020)
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)5 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$549
Current price$247 (2.3x MSRP)$303 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3050 and Ryzen 9 5900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data2x 80.7 + 125 (I/O) mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3050 and Ryzen 9 5900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170AM4
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3050 and Ryzen 9 5900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3050 and Ryzen 9 5900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3050 and Ryzen 9 5900X are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3050 and Ryzen 9 5900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel® Celeron® Processor N3000 Series-
Max video memory8 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency600 MHz-
Execution Units12-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3050 and Ryzen 9 5900X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3050 and Ryzen 9 5900X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+-
OpenGL+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3050 and Ryzen 9 5900X.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N3050 587
Ryzen 9 5900X 39165
+6572%

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron N3050 by 6572% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3050 153
Ryzen 9 5900X 2184
+1327%

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron N3050 by 1327% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3050 265
Ryzen 9 5900X 11900
+4391%

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron N3050 by 4391% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron N3050 1099
Ryzen 9 5900X 6828
+521%

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron N3050 by 521% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron N3050 2064
Ryzen 9 5900X 52076
+2423%

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron N3050 by 2423% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron N3050 1243
Ryzen 9 5900X 16438
+1222%

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron N3050 by 1222% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Celeron N3050 1
Ryzen 9 5900X 42
+5189%

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron N3050 by 5189% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron N3050 63
Ryzen 9 5900X 2695
+4212%

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron N3050 by 4212% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron N3050 34
Ryzen 9 5900X 250
+635%

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron N3050 by 635% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Celeron N3050 0.41
Ryzen 9 5900X 3.14
+666%

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron N3050 by 666% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N3050 0.4
Ryzen 9 5900X 21.2
+4948%

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron N3050 by 4948% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N3050 529
Ryzen 9 5900X 13361
+2426%

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron N3050 by 2426% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N3050 5
Ryzen 9 5900X 191
+3930%

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron N3050 by 3930% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N3050 26
Ryzen 9 5900X 335
+1213%

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron N3050 by 1213% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 5 November 2020
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Cost $107 $549
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 105 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron N3050 and Ryzen 9 5900X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N3050 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 5900X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3050 and Ryzen 9 5900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3050
Celeron N3050
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 502 votes

Rate Celeron N3050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 3227 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3050 or Ryzen 9 5900X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.