E-240 vs Celeron N2805

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N2805
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.21
+75%

Celeron N2805 outperforms E-240 by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2805 and E-240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32143354
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD E-Series
Power efficiency4.970.63
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date11 September 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2805 and E-240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.46 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)64 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm40 nm
Die sizeno data75 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2805 and E-240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)4.3 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2805 and E-240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2805 and E-240 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2805 and E-240 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2805 and E-240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3 Single-channel
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesAMD Radeon HD 6310
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2805 and E-240 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2805 and E-240.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2805 0.21
+75%
E-240 0.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2805 335
+71.8%
E-240 195

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron N2805 756
E-240 938
+24%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron N2805 885
+76.8%
E-240 501

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron N2805 85.2
+61.3%
E-240 137.4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 0.12
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.32
Recency 11 September 2013 4 January 2011
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 18 Watt

Celeron N2805 has a 75% higher aggregate performance score, 140.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 81.8% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N2805 is our recommended choice as it beats the E-240 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2805 and E-240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2805
Celeron N2805
AMD E-240
E-240

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 101 vote

Rate Celeron N2805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 55 votes

Rate E-240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2805 or E-240, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.