Atom C3308 vs Celeron N2805

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2805 and Atom C3308 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3216not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Power efficiency4.97no data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date11 September 2013 (11 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$32

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2805 and Atom C3308 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.46 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz2.1 GHz
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache56K (per core)112 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature80 °C89 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2805 and Atom C3308 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)4.3 Watt9.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2805 and Atom C3308. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2805 and Atom C3308 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2805 and Atom C3308 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2805 and Atom C3308. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory size4 GB128 GB
Max memory channels11
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2805 and Atom C3308 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2805 and Atom C3308.

PCIe version2.03
PCI Express lanes46
USB revision3.0 and 2.03
Total number of SATA ports26
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data6
Number of USB ports58
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2013 15 August 2017
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 9 Watt

Celeron N2805 has 125% lower power consumption.

Atom C3308, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2805 and Atom C3308. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N2805 is a notebook processor while Atom C3308 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2805 and Atom C3308, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2805
Celeron N2805
Intel Atom C3308
Atom C3308

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 101 vote

Rate Celeron N2805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3308 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2805 or Atom C3308, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.